Weevil News |
http://www.curci.de/Inhalt.html |
No. 21 |
4 pp. |
15. September 2004 |
ISSN 1615-3472 |
|
Stüben, P.E. & Bayer, Ch. (2004): CURCULIO Institute established in Eastern Middle Europe! Report on
the 3rd international Conference of the CURCULIO Institute in Ochotnica
Górna (Western Carpathians), Poland, 1st to 7th August 2004. - Weevil News: http://www.curci.de/Inhalt.html,
No. 21: 4 pp., CURCULIO-Institute:
Mönchengladbach. (ISSN 1615-3472). |
|||||
The East
European Office of the CURCULIO Institute, founded in March 2003, performed the
meeting perfectly organized, and Dr. Stanislaw Knutelski (Cracow) resolved the
leading of the conference masterfully. [W21. E1]
The mountain station (in Ochotnica Górna) of the Department of Entomology of
the Jagiellonian University turned out to be an ideal laboratory and conference
center for the paticipants from Poland, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan and Switzerland. [W21. E2]
A short visit at the residence of Prof. Boguslaw Petryszak in the forest of the
northern Gorce
Mountains was impressive to our delegation. Prof. Petryszak was
still enthusiastic about some inspiring field trips together with the famous
Lothar Dieckmann (Germany) in the 1970ies and 1980ies. [W21. E3]
The Polish colleagues are not only masters of planning, but also of
improvising. A fire in the early morning of the final day of our meeting
damaging the Institute
of Zoology of the Jagiellonian University of
Cracow did not cause the early end of the conference. [W21.
E4] A colleague of Dr. Knutelski, Prof. Dr. Zbigniew Dabrowski
(Department of Physiology of Jagiellonian University), offered ‘private
scientific asylum’ to the participants and by moving closer together the final
part of the conference was saved. [W21. E5]
In the end a visit to the famous old town of Cracow was the cultural highlight
for our international group of weevil-researchers. The variety of languages was
as it turned out not an insuperable obstacle, but a valuable addition to our
discussion. [W21. E6]
Collecting „monophagous“ – analysing and
utilizing „polyphagous“
One week of
getting up early, intensive field trips and using as much collecting methods as
possible [W21. E27][W21. D28] – sometimes working to the
point of exhaustion [W21. E7][W21. E8]. In WEEVIL NEWS there will be a separate
publication on the results of our faunistical studies of the region of the
Tatra Mountains by S. Knutelski and P. Sprick. This will be the chance to
convey experience and new observations to the public which facilitates
scientific innovation.
This means more than just hopping from lecture to lecture on a ‘sterile’
conference. [W21. E9] Usually scientists are on
a field trip alone with ‘their’ weevils and host plants. [W21. E10][W21. E11] So it is not obvious to exchange new experience and interesting
observations around a campfire [W21. E12] or in
the conference laboratory immediately. [W21. E13]
Learning from each other without loss of face [W21. E14]
and without grabbing for academical reputation – where can one experience this
today?! [W21. E15]
Of course there were also short talks, but always in an asking-researching way
– never just giving a speech to a bored audience.
There was for instance a discussion on „species description in the internet“.
It is important to realize that descriptions in the internet will be reality
and are reality in some cases already (P. Stüben). We shall ask ourselves not
any longer if but how to make such publications valid and save (Ch. Bayer). One
further question was how to realize ‘stability’ and ‘intersubjective control’
without cutting back scientific licence. We do not need more „law and order“,
there is already enough of it, but we need more creative power to handle the
new digital challenge!
The confusion about „higher systematics of weevils“ is disturbing to some
scientists (E. Colonnelli) [W21. E16], to some
it is not. „Members of species are able to mate, genera have never been
observed during such procedure“ (M. Kostal). And with some Far Eastern wisdom
one may also make progress. „Instead of discussing to much you better start to
work intensively“ (H. Yoshitake) [W21. E17]. And that means: Instead of
discussing the meaning of separate distinguishing marks from more or less
accidental standpoints one shall better push forward phylogenetic and
biogeographic research at all levels.
Sometimes the practice may become the problem itself. That may happen when
there is nobody able to determinate your specimen of Curculionoidea of Cyprus
(G. Alziar). If one has to wait several years for the determination by
overtaxed specialists, someones patience is wearing thin. Even in this case
there is still a promising solution. „Just finish your annotated list of
species and depict all specimen without determination” (P. Stüben). Where? Why
not in the WEEVIL NEWS (Editor: P. Sprick)?! Wake curiosity and vanity of the
specialists. They will than look for new species more in the internet than in
the field… “Be certain, specialists will find your digital photographs of
specimens and aedeagi quicker than you are travelling from Nice to Cyprus“ (N.
N.).
Sometimes the evening discussions turned out to be entomo-political: For some
scientists „Red Lists“ are forcing lame governments to act more from the
ecological point of view (P. Sprick). [W21. E18]
But entomologists sometimes also suffer from ‘nature protection’ in a
paradoxial way. Every new protected area might be a dangerous pitfall to those
without collecting permit. Then they may in the worst case end up in a Spanish
or Turkish prison.
For all that ambivalent prospects one may realize: Amongst us „phytophagous
weevils“ the atmosphere was always peaceful and relaxed. [W21. E19] It is known that there is a much more rough
behaviour amongst carnivorous individuals.
Take the academy into your living room, if
there is a fire again at university!
It is well
known that there has been written a lot about burnt offering in the history of
the old Greek civilization: It brings about a purification of senses and
thoughts and focusses the attention to the essential part.
But what is essential?
A society growing continuously, year after year welcoming new members and
dismissing members unwilling to pay – or a society every year creating
something new in SNUDEBILLER? (Ch. Bayer & P. Stüben) P. Stüben for
instance compiled a Power Point presentation for the members of the CURCULIO
Institute. [W21. E20] In the near future
everybody will be able to present the work of the CURCULIO Institute to the
public wherever he uses the chance… There again weevils (and pictures) learn to
walk, scroll-pictures become an infinite papyrus and zapping through the
taxonomic menu service of the SNUDEBILLER-program means to have a lot of fun
doing taxonomy of weevils in this way. May be this not just pure science, may
be ‘didactics’ are also playing an important role – because in the end we do
not want to become a sort of „living fossil“. Therefore always think of the
next generation! [W21. E21]
The next generation will take the academy to the living room finally. The
presentation of “The phylogenetic framework for the tribe Phytobiini” by H.
Yoshitake, the youngest member of the CURCULIO Institute was impressing. [W21. E22] There was the critical remark that dried
material is not usable for genetic analysis (P. Tykarski). With Japanese
politeness H. Yoshitake leaded up to the pleading demand: If I have to use
fresh material exclusively, please help me to find living specimens of the
European Phytobiini e. g. Pelenomus velaris – and please do not forget
to put it in ethyl alcohol.
P. Tykarski presented a database project
(with cooperation of S. Knutelsky) on weevils of the Tatra Mountains. [W21. E23] Today faunistic large-scale
projects can be realized with the digital technology and some inventiveness.
But if there is a lack of cooperation such projects are endangered to get stuck
halfway.
The “pornographic end” of the meeting will be unforgettable to all
participants. A furtive glance to the wide open eyes of computer freaks and
photographers of the SNUDEBILLER in astonishment was enough. Something like
that they did observe never before. The master himself presented “Male and
female weevils – a look on sexual conflicts and reproductive tactics” and we
all went home in a thoughtful mood. Watching the fantastic screen-presentation
of Marek W. Kozlowski we realized: We are working neither on ‘weevil material’,
holo- and paratypes nor on simple ‘objects’ of our academical curiosity. Is it
of any use to describe species which will be extinct in the near future? What
will it mean when our children marvel at species only represented by holotypes
in a museum?
In his documentary M. W. Kozlowski tells us: “You are working on ‘subjects’ and
you might be a good advocate for your group, the weevils. You shall take over
their case!”
Marek - we got the message!
Conclusion
This
meeting in the Western Tatra Mountains (Tatra, Pieniny, Gorce) and in the City of Cracow was both successful in
every respect and a memorable experience. [W21.
E24]
And last
but not least: As a member of CURCULIO Institute you shall join the next
international meeting in April 2006! Where to? At our general meeting there was
a promising proposal: The Canary Islands, Tenerife. [W21.
E25] The CURCULIO Institute will prepare the meeting in cooperation with
the local colleagues.
Participants [W21. E26]
Gabriel & Hélène Alziar (F), Friedhelm Bahr (D), Christoph Bayer
(D), Piotr Bialooki (PL), Enzo Colonnelli (I), Christoph Germann (CH),
Stanislaw Knutelski (PL), Michael Kostal (CZ), Boguslaw Petryszak (PL), Peter
Sprick (D), Robert Stejskal (CZ), Peter Stüben (D), Jurek Szypula (PL), Piotr
Tykarski (PL) and Hiraku Yoshitake (J).
Stan, many thanks! [W21. E29]